Swatch grazing could be alternative winter feeding strategy

8 months ago 140

Planning for winter feed is an important step in beef cattle operations. Alternatives include stockpiling, corn stalk grazing and bale grazing. Swath grazing -- also known as windrow grazing -- has recently gained interest as an additional option. It has potential to reduce time and fuel costs associated with baling, hauling and feeding out hay. It consists of growing annual grasses, cutting them in late fall and gathering forage in windrows. Animals, typically dry beef cows due to their lower nutritional requirements, are allowed to graze the forage. The practice is popular in western Canada and some U.S. locations, but it is not widespread in the Midwest.

Some Midwest grazing systems use cool-season cereals followed by cool- or warm-season annual grasses to supplement perennial forage pastures. In Canada and Iowa swath grazing evaluations, oats were grazed, followed by no-till planting of millet and sorghum, or barley and triticale. In Iowa trials, forage sorghum and pearl millet were planted in early June and cut once for hay in July. Leaving about eight to 10 inches of stubble, sorghum and millet were allowed to regrow the rest of the season to be used under swath grazing. That two-cut system, where second growth is used for swath grazing, provided higher quality for the swaths. Forages were cut and windrowed late fall to early winter, after the first hard frost and prior to major snowfall. Windrows measured about two feet across and nine inches deep in Iowa -- where they raked two mower passes together -- while in Canada swaths were three feet wide and 18 inches deep. In both, swathed forage was left in windrows on the ground. Some farmers merge two mower passes together to keep more of it off the ground, which helps reduce decomposition, makes it easier for cattle to find under snow and improves utilization compared to smaller windrows. Merging more than two passes may increase waste from cattle laying in the windrows if too much forage is offered at one time.

It is common for cows to be moved to swathed fields after other feed sources are used. Swathed fields should have a perimeter fence with temporary or moveable wire at the “leading edge” running perpendicular to the rows. Initial grazing area should allow for about three days’ worth of herd grazing, with the leading edge wire moving down the rows to expand the grazing area for three more days of grazing as winter progresses. In that strategy, cows can access areas they have already grazed because the water source is typically located on the starting end of the field. In Iowa trials, cattle numbers were adjusted to field size to provide sufficient swath grazing from late December to mid- February – about two head per acre of total field. Each farm is different – a shorter length for the swath grazing season may be a reasonable approach. Using swath grazing for one to two months in early winter may be a good fit for some operations and help lower over-winter feeding costs.

Due to the likelihood of snow cover, swath grazing systems are best suited for bred non-lactating cows because they are more aggressive grazers and will dig through snow to access swaths. Cows due to calve in mid- to late March would align well with the system. It is important to note, in successful swath grazing conducted in Iowa and Canada, they supplemented the cows beginning three weeks before calving.

Nutritive value declines with standing forage maturity and over time after swathing. However, results from Iowa and Canada showed swaths from various species retained enough nutrients for dry mid-gestation cows. Swath utilization is equivalent or greater, 69 percent to 82 percent, than baled hay, 85 percent, and stockpile grazing, 40 percent.

While swath grazing may seem a viable option for winter feeding, there are challenges that must be addressed. A perimeter fence is needed. If using previous hay ground or corn and soybean fields, adding sufficient fencing may be a considerable upfront expense. Because the ground is frozen, many swath grazing operations use “tumblewheels,” which do not penetrate the ground like typical temporary fence posts. They roll over top of the ground on six legs held upright by tension of the single leading edge wire, running through the center of the wheel. Fields must also be accessible for harvesting and windrowing equipment. It may not be an issue out west or in Iowa, but southwestern Wisconsin is known for its hilly landscape with steep slopes. Water needs to be within a reasonable distance throughout the grazing period. If one does not exist, running water to the field may be another expense. There are also risks when operating a mower in cold temperatures. Crop and soil residue can build up in and around cutter heads and discs during normal use. If not cleaned after the final cutting during warm weather, they can freeze and prohibit operation, resulting in costly breakdowns. Planning ahead with the mower is an important consideration. Letting it warm up in a heated shop prior to use is advantageous.

Despite challenges, there are also benefits to a swath grazing system when well-executed. There is better forage utilization compared to stockpiling. Because animals are spread out across swathed field and not confined to smaller lots, cows tend to be cleaner, and their new calves have less incidence of scours. It also distributes manure more uniformly across the field compared to bale feeding, which in turn alleviates dead spots from bales and reduces or eliminates field preparation for planting the following crop. Swathed forage never leaves the field and is ready for cattle to consume, thus saving time and money compared to hauling of hay and manure needed in other winter feeding options. Reductions in cost can reach $25 to $26 per acre compared to bale grazing and stockpiling. Some species -- warm season annuals in particular -- add drought tolerance to a forage system, a great benefit during hot and dry seasons. Another benefit is adding another crop into the rotation to help reduce disease and pest pressure and maintaining soil cover throughout the year.

The article is written by Kimberly Kester, William Halfman and Marta Kohmann.

Be the first to know

Get local news delivered to your inbox!

Read Entire Article